New Grading Policy

In the present , I would like to provide my arguments against the novel demolishing policy , whose nature is hit-or-miss selection of wanders . In fact there argon two points of its fallibility : the fact that it genuinely measures bookmans luck rather than their square achievements and that it destroys the entire invention of training as the process of gaining knowledge and skillsFirst of all , it is necessary to patch the term scoring . According to the gentilityal Policies direction , grading is the briny symbolic method of recording the evaluation of a student s academic achievement (Educational Policies Committee , 1991 . Evaluation , in expel , put up be defined as assessment of the measure of individual achievements , according to the existing statemental standards . Education , according to Fuhrmann and Grasha (1983 , is the maintenance of knowledge , skills and character of students through consecutive motivation (Fuhrmann and Grasha , 1983 ,.156As blaze can understand , the impudently grading policy does non set up the interrelation mingled with the student s academic attainments and performance and the symbolic mark , garner or figure . Those learners whose achievements atomic number 18 poorer have an opportunity to absorb higher dictates through random selection method , whereas more than successful and hard-working students might disregard in terms of grade .

Consequently , one can sum up that t he hot policy actually measures the soulfu! lness s luck , as the grade does not depend upon their efforts , skills or abilitiesFurthermore , given the definition of culture , it is possible to assume that the new grading policy contradicts to the purpose of college or university studies . This principle of grading does not motivate students to develop the necessary knowledge and skills , as their performance is not fitly evaluated , i .e . the truth more or less the value of achievement is reprobate . Therefore , students , being awake(predicate) of the fact that the true instruction about their attainment forget not be provided are unlikely to work on their academic performance and lapse the willingness to succeedTo sum up , a positive appraisal of one s achievements is amongst the major incentives in the education system . The learners thus are unlikely to become true professionals after this motivator is eliminated with the presentment of the new grading policyWorks citedEducational Policies Committee . Responsibi lity for mark and Grading Policy . 4 Apr 1991Fuhrmann , B . and Grasha , A . A functional Handbook for College Teachers Boston : piffling Brown , 1993PAGEPAGE 2...If you want to drive a full essay, high society it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay